Appeal No. 94-0995 Application No. 07/662,722 Japanese Abstract 53-130752A Nov. 15, 1978 (JP 53-130752A) The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 1 through 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Grape, Favre, and Blizzard; and (2) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 1 through 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over "JP 53-130752A." On consideration of the record, we shall reverse these rejections. BACKGROUND The prosecution history of this application represents somewhat of a procedural quagmire and, therefore, we believe that a discussion of background information is necessary before reaching the dispositive issues on appeal. In the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7), the examiner rejected claims 1 through 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Grape. In a nutshell, the examiner's reasoning proceeded along these lines. First, the difference between Grape's composition and the claimed composition is component (B). In Grape, component (B) is an acyloxy or -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007