Ex parte HANSON et al. - Page 15




                 Appeal No. 94-3255                                                                                                                     
                 Application 07/673,264                                                                                                                 


                 MGA3.   Rather, Category 3 encompasses Bacillus MGA3 which7                                                                                                                             
                 have changes in morphology, as well as other biological                                                                                
                 properties.  Since the specification only describes one                                                                                
                 morphological mutant, the relevant inquiry, here, is: what                                                                             
                 morphological mutants, other than strain Gr, are encompassed                                                                           
                 by the claim?  While we agree that the claim encompasses that                                                                          
                 which the appellants appear to argue; i.e., morphological                                                                              
                 mutants which arise within a culture of Bacillus MGA3, yet are                                                                         
                 identical to Bacillus MGA3 in every other respect, we find the                                                                         
                 claim vague and indefinite in that it is unclear what                                                                                  
                 additional mutants of Bacillus MGA3 the appellants intend.                                                                             
                          The concurring opinion concludes that claim 55 is                                                                             
                 indefinite because (i) it appears to be directed to a nutrient                                                                         
                 medium which does not contain biotin, (ii) it appears to be                                                                            
                 directed to a nutrient medium which includes carbon and energy                                                                         
                 sources other than methanol, such as glucose or mannitol,                                                                              
                 (iii) it is not clear what amounts of amino acid production                                                                            
                 the appellants intend, and (iv) it is not clear that the                                                                               


                          7Note the discussion above, with respect to the                                                                               
                 indefiniteness of the phrase “having all the identifying                                                                               
                 characteristics of Bacillus MGA3.”                                                                                                     
                                                                          15                                                                            





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007