THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte WILLIAM J. JOHNSON, ROBERT S. KELLER and GEORGE C. MANTHURUHIL _____________ Appeal No. 94-3999 Application 08/083,8631 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 18-23 . 2 1Application for patent filed June 28, 1993. According to appellants, this is a continuation of Application 07/793,748, filed November 18, 1991. 2Appellants’ amendment filed July 22, 1993 (Paper No. 12) contains two claims 22, one an (continued...) 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007