THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte JOHN D. BASIL, ROBERT M. HUNIA and CHIA-CHENG LIN ________________ Appeal No. 95-0808 Application 08/048,8661 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed April 14, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/300,663, filed January 23, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/914,857, filed October 3, 1986, now U.S. Patent No. 4,799,963, issued January 24, 1989. -1-1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007