Ex parte FIORE et al. - Page 3




              Appeal No. 95-1402                                                                                          
              Application No. 07/936,507                                                                                  


                          a communications manager communicating with the global data base                                
                     manager for sending data to each address identified by the global data                               
                     base manager; and                                                                                    
                          a plurality of operator stations disposed in proximity to the respective                        
                     addresses in the paper mill and being in communication with the global data                          
                     base manager, each said operator station being operative to display data                             
                     communicated thereto and capable of correlating and reformatting said data                           
                     to analyze the effects of operational changes at one location in the mill on                         
                     performance at that location or at other locations in the mill and being                             
                     operative to make operational changes throughout the mill to insure                                  
                     conformance to specifications.                                                                       

                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Reiter et al. (Reiter)                   4,604,686                           Aug.  05, 1986                 
              Cope                                     4,304,001                           Dec.  01, 1981                 
              Beasley et al. (Beasley)                 4,827,423                           May   02, 1989                 
              J.. R. Lavigne, “An Introduction to Paper Industry Instrumentation,” 402-15 (1972)                          


                     Claims 1-3, and 5-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                       
              over Lavigne alone or Lavigne in view of Reiter.  Claims 4, 8, 10 and 11 stand rejected                     
              under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lavigne alone or in view of Reiter as                      
              applied against claims 1-3 and 5-7 further in view of Cope.  Claim 9 stands rejected under                  
              35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lavigne in view of Reiter further in view of                     
              Cope as applied against claims 8 and 10 further in view of Beasley.                                         


                                                           -3-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007