Ex parte FIORE et al. - Page 6




              Appeal No. 95-1402                                                                                          
              Application No. 07/936,507                                                                                  


              converted into usable data displayed on the terminals.  Means for converting electrical                     
              signals to digital or vice-versa are conventional and inherently disclosed in Lavigne.”  (See               
              answer at pages 3-4.)  We disagree with the examiner that Lavigne inherently reformats                      
              data into a single or common data format.  Lavigne merely discloses that the different                      
              subunits of the paper mill process control may be formed into a single system to control                    
              overall operation of the mill.  (See Figure 19-11.)  Lavigne does not disclose or suggest                   
              any manner of data handling or manipulation within the combined system.    Appellants                       
              argue that the examiner has “overlooked the specific arrangement of the major                               
              components of the claimed invention and the advantages inherent in that arrangement.”                       
              (See brief at page 3.)  We agree with appellants.                                                           


                                            LAVIGNE IN VIEW OF REITER                                                     

                     As discussed above, Lavigne does not disclose or suggest any manner of data                          
              handling or manipulation within the combined system.  The examiner supplies Reiter as a                     
              teaching of “integrating data in a distributed processing environment with means for                        
              reformatting the data into a single format (Fig. 7 and claims 13-15).”  (See answer at page                 
              4.)  Appellants argue that “[t]he art of record includes absolutely no disclosure which would               
              motivate one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the apparatus of L[a]vigne  by                          
              incorporating whatever reformatting function that may be disclosed in Reiter.”  (See brief at               


                                                           -6-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007