THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAJESH B PAREKH, ANTHONY H. MERRY,
and JAMES BRUCE
____________
Appeal No. 95-1881
Application 08/032,1661
____________
HEARING: January 14, 1999
____________
Before GRON, WEIFFENBACH, and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from an
Application for patent filed March 12, 1993. According1
to applicants, this application is a continuation of U.S.
Application 07/719,288, filed June 21, 1991, abandoned.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007