Appeal No. 95-2165 Page 10
Application
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
paragraph one, “as the specification as originally filed, does
not provide support for the invention as now claimed,” is
reversed.
The rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Kilian or Orlowski is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1 and 5 through 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Lee is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1, 2, and 5 through 9 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Cohen is affirmed. The
rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated
by Cohen is reversed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007