THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SUSAN THYS-JACOBS
____________
Appeal No. 95-2220
Application No. 08/059,6821
____________
HEARD: January 11, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1 through 12.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a method for
treating premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Specifically, the
method requires administering to an individual having symptoms
1Application for patent filed May 10, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007