THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ACHIM HARTMANN
____________
Appeal No. 95-2245
Application No. 08,011,5631
____________
HEARD: January 11, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Achim Harmann (appellant) appeals from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4 and 6 through 12, which are
all of the claims remaining in the application.
Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal
and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed February 1, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007