Appeal No. 95-2346
Application 08/147,093
pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a method of
manufacturing a changeable image type novelty card using an
in-line offset printing and in-line finishing system
(specification, page 3). An understanding of the invention
can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 12 and 16
which appear in the appendix to appellant's corrected brief
filed September 15, 1994.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Kroner 2,311,946 Feb. 23, 1943
Bellis 2,611,201 Sep. 23, 1952
Smith 2,639,254 May 19, 1953
Cummings 4,514,248 Apr. 30, 1985
Voy et al. (Voy) 4,661,189 Apr. 28, 1987
Dean 4,697,364 Oct. 06,
1987
Cannistra 4,938,830 Jul. 03,
1990
Malachowski et al. 5,118,375 Jun. 02, 1992
(Malachowski) (Filed Aug. 09, 1990)
The following rejections are before us for review:
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007