Appeal No. 95-2346
Application 08/147,093
(1) Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Dean in view of Bellis in
combination with either Cannistra or Malachowski;
(2) Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Dean in view of Bellis in
combination with either Cannistra or Malachowski, as applied
in (1) above, and further in view of Kroner;
(3) Claims 8, 9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Dean in view of Bellis in
combination with either Cannistra or Malachowski and Kroner as
applied in (2) above, further in view of Cummings;
(4) Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Dean in view of Bellis in combination
with either Cannistra or Malachowski and Kroner and Cummings
as applied in (3) above, further in view of Voy.
(5) Claims 12, 15, 16 and 19 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Dean in view of Bellis
in combination with either Cannistra or Malachowski, as
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007