Ex parte CHANG - Page 5




              Appeal No. 1995-2437                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/035,723                                                                               


              judgment, the only reason or suggestion to modify the references to arrive at the present                
              invention comes from appellant’s specification.                                                          
              Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                      








                                    35 U.S.C. §§ 102(f) and 112, first paragraph                                       
                     U.S. Patent No. 5,872,222 (the ‘222 patent) issued from application serial no.                    
              07/993,291, an application closely related to the present application.  Claims 1 and 7 of                
              the ‘222 patent read as follows:                                                                         
                     1.  A conjugate comprising a substantially nonimmunogenic polymer coupled                         
                     with a plurality of binding molecules, each being specific for an antigen on a                    
                     T cell, and said binding molecules lacking an Fc portion.                                         
                     7.  An improved method for producing antibodies against an immunogen,                             
                     comprising administering the conjugate of claim 1 to a host animal together                       
                     with the immunogen and thereby increasing the immunogenic response                                
                     against the antigen, and screening for antibodies, or cells producing                             
                     antibodies, which are specifically reactive with the immunogen.                                   
                     It is apparent from a review of ‘222 that the patented method and the methods that                
              are the subject of this appeal are closely related and parallel each other.  Thus it appears             
              that the continued rejection of the claims in the present application under 35 U.S.C. §                  


                                                          5                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007