Appeal No. 95-2688 Application No. 07/845,560 Arthur G. Schwart et al., "Novel Dehydroepiandrosterone Analogues with Enhanced 1 Biological Activity and Reduced Side Effects in Mice and Rats, " 48, Cancer Research 4817-4822 (1988) The appealed claims stand rejected for obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) over Kligman in view of the Orentreich patents. We cannot sustain the stated rejection. OPINION The examiner's rejection of the appealed claims is predicated on his assertion that it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in this art to substitute “the DHEA of the secondary references for the steroids" of Kligman "in view of their similar activity and structure," thereby arriving at the claimed invention, since Kligman teaches a "composition containing steroids and retinoids" (answer, page 3). Initially, we point out that Kligman's disclosure is directed to compositions containing glucocorticoids, not steroids in a generic sense, as held by the examiner. Secondly, the examiner has provided no factual support for the contention that glucocorticoids and DHEA have similar activity and structure. Indeed, as appellant has argued, glucocorticoids and DHEA are chemically distinct and are not functionally equivalent, and appellant has cited multiple publications in this record in support of his assertions. In this regard, the May publication relied upon by appellant indicates that 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007