Ex parte LEE - Page 6




                     Appeal No. 95-2741                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/008,120                                                                                                                                            


                                The Lee patent was relied upon as evidence that certain features of the dependent claims were                                                          
                     old.                                                                                                                                                              
                                Applicant argues the Patent Office has not established a prima facie case of obviousness.                                                              
                     Applicant’s position is understood from the following excerpt from the Brief:                                                                                     
                                                     Austin clearly discloses a conventional carbon black production                                                                   
                                           process wherein a quench injecting a liquid quenching fluid is utilized to                                                                  
                                           stop pyrolysis of the carbon black yielding feedstock.  Austin does not                                                                     
                                           disclose or suggest the use of a lined wall heat exchanger to cool the                                                                      
                                           effluent and stop pyrolysis of the carbon black yielding feedstock.  Thus                                                                   
                                           Austin fails to disclose or suggest Appellant’s claimed invention.  Austin                                                                  
                                           clearly teaches the conventional practice of injecting water into the                                                                       
                                           effluent stream to cool the effluent stream and stop pyrolysis and                                                                          
                                           contains no suggestion to use other than standard conventional                                                                              
                                           equipment for making carbon blacks.  Therefore, Austin cannot suggest                                                                       
                                           the use of a lined wall heat exchanger such as specified in the present                                                                     
                                           claims.  Moreover, since Austin teaches a process wherein the effluent                                                                      
                                           is cooled and pyrolysis is stopped by the injection of quench water into                                                                    
                                           the effluent, there would be no reason in the process disclosed by                                                                          
                                           Austin to utilize a lined wall heat exchanger to cool the effluent to stop                                                                  
                                           pyrolysis of the reaction.  To utilize sufficient quench to stop pyrolysis in                                                               
                                           a process where a lined wall heat exchanger is to be used for the same                                                                      
                                           purpose would not only be uneconomical, but also, and more                                                                                  
                                           importantly, negate the advantages resulting from the use of the lined                                                                      
                                           wall heat exchanger.[16]                                                                                                                    
                                Applicant has not challenge the examiner’s reliance on Lee other than to note that the reference                                                       
                     did not cure the deficiencies of the Austin patent.17                                                                                                             
                                2.         Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph                                                                                           
                                The examiner rejected claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as indefinite. As we                                                             

                                16  Appeal Brief, page 7.                                                                                                                              
                                17  Appeal Brief, page 9, second paragraph.                                                                                                            
                                                                                          6                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007