THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PANOLIL C. RAVEENDRANATH
and JOHN A. WICHTOWSKI
__________
Appeal No. 95-2993
Application 08/019,3871
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, METZ and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 2 through 12 and 14, all the claims remaining in the application. Claims 1 and
1Application for patent filed February 18, 1993. According to the appellants, this
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/841,694, filed February 26, 1992,
now U.S. Patent 5,210,081.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007