Ex parte RAVEENDRANATH et al. - Page 4




              Appeal No. 95-2993                                                                                          
              Application 08/019,387                                                                                      
              known in the art.  Accordingly, we conclude that the specification disclosure as to the                     
              estrogenic activity of the claimed compounds would have enabled those skilled in the art to                 
              use the claimed compounds for the treatment of estrogen-related disorders and                               
              atherosclerosis.                                                                                            
                     In view of the foregoing, the rejection is reversed.                                                 


                                                     Other Issues                                                         
                     We note that claims 9 and 11 are directed to the treatment of atherosclerosis using                  
              8,9 dehydroestrone.  To that end, we direct attention to our discussion, above, that the                    
              specification refers to a U.S. patent for its disclosure that 8,9 dehydroestrone is known to                
              possess estrogenic activity and to lower blood lipid levels.  Specification, p. 1, lines 23-28.             
              In their brief, the appellants state that 8,9 dehydroestrone (i) is known to possess                        
              estrogenic activity (is an active steroid) and that persons skilled in the art know how to use              
              such compounds without detailed instruction (Brief, para. bridging pp. 2-3), and (ii) is a                  
              useful antilipidemic agent as shown by U.S. 3,391,169 (Brief, p. 4, last para.).                            
                     In view of these admissions, upon return of this application to the corps, the                       
              examiner and the appellants should consider whether it was known in the art to use 8,9                      
              dehydroestrone in the methods described in claims 9 and 11.  Alternatively, the examiner                    
              might wish to consider whether the teachings of the referenced U.S. patent                                  




                                                            4                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007