THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARNOLD BROSSI, MALGORZATA BRZOSTOWSKA,
S. RAPOPORT, and NIGEL GREIG
____________
Appeal No. 95-3117
Application 08/096,2071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed July 26, 1993.1
According to applicants, this application is a continuation
of Application 07/861,329, filed March 31, 1992, now
abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/765,746,
filed September 26, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,171,750.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007