THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHINOBU YAMAO and WATARU KOSAKA
__________
Appeal No. 95-3220
Application 08/112,9861
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 7, 9 and 21
through 30, all the claims pending in the application. Claims 7 and 9 are illustrative of the
subject matter on appeal and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed August 30, 1993. According to the appellants, this
application is a continuation of Application 07/821,304, filed January 13, 1992 which is a
division of Application 07/603,162, filed October 25, 1990, both abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007