Appeal No. 95-3320
Application 07/974,510
having ordinary skill in the art to expect that antibody-
containing
serum which has been obtained from the blood of a domestic
fowl immunized using human hair as an antigen would be useful
in hair care products?
(3) Would the combined prior art teachings have suggested
to one having ordinary skill in the art to use yolk antibody
which has been obtained from an egg of a domestic fowl
immunized using human hair as an antigen in hair care
products?
(4) Would the combined prior art teachings reasonably
have led one having ordinary skill in the art to expect that
yolk antibody which has been obtained from an egg of a
domestic fowl immunized using human hair as an antigen would
be useful in hair care products?
To answer these questions and determine the patentability
of the claimed subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in light
of the applied prior art, we have considered the evidence and
arguments of record, including the specification and claims,
appellants’ Appeal and Reply Briefs, the Examiner’s Answer,
the applied prior art, the Declaration Under 37 CFR 1.132 by
Hiroshi Nojiri, filed February 17, 1994, the attachments
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007