THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MITSURU HATTORI
____________
Appeal No. 95-3336
Application No. 07/984,4481
____________
HEARD: February 11, 1999
____________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4, which are
the only claims in this application.
According to appellant, the invention is directed to a
method for manufacturing ceramic articles having one or more
holes penetrating into or through the body of the article
1Application for patent filed December 2, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007