Appeal No. 95-3336
Application No. 07/984,448
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that there is no
reason, suggestion, or motivation to combine the references in
the manner proposed by the examiner. Accordingly, the
examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness
and the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 4 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Conder in view of Hattori or
Yogi is reversed. In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d at 1358, 47 USPQ2d
at 1458 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007