THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS E. VOGEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-3353
Application No. 07/855,7991
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 3 through 11, and 20 through 22, which are all
of the claims pending in this application. Separate
amendments after final rejection filed on April 26, 1994 and
August 1, 1994 are entered as advised in a communication
1Application for patent filed March 23, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007