Ex parte VOGEL - Page 5




          Appeal No. 95-3353                                         Page 5           
          Application No. 07/855,799                                                  

               Claims 3-11 and 20-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 as being unpatentable over Vandenberg in view of Aotani.                


                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered all the evidence of                       
          record, including the specification, claims, the applied prior              
          art, and  the respective positions articulated by the                       
          appellant and the examiner in the briefs and answers thereto.               
          As a result, we agree with appellant that the combined prior                
          art references as applied by the examiner do not render the                 
          subject matter defined by the claims prima facie obvious.                   
          Accordingly, we shall not sustain the examiner's rejection for              
          the reasons as follows.                                                     
               Vandenberg discloses polyethers that contain pendent                   
          azidomethyl groups and teaches that these polymers are                      
          crosslinkable by heat, photolysis, and the addition of                      
          polyfunctional dipolarophiles (column 3, lines 39-47).                      
          Patentee also suggests that the disclosed polyethers have                   
          diverse utilities including use "as coatings of improved                    
          adhesion for substrates such as metal, glass, textiles, paper,              
          wood..." (column 3, lines 47-54).                                           








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007