THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EMILY A. GROVES, WAYNE E. BAILEY, DOUGLAS E. PARADIS
and HOMER K. CHEUNG
________________
Appeal No. 1995-3416
Application No. 08/127,7071
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 26-
29. Claims 1-9, the other claims remaining in the present
1Application for patent filed September 28, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/850,643, filed March 13, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007