THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ISRAEL BEINGLASS and MAHALINGAM VENKATESAN ____________ Appeal No. 95-3438 Application No. 08/033,6561 ____________ HEARD: February 8, 1999 ____________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7. The subject matter on appeal is directed to a method of depositing a stoichiometric silicon nitride film of uniform thickness on a single substrate (e.g., a single large diameter 1Application for patent filed March 16, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007