THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE ARRAUDEAU, JEANNE PATRAUD and BERTRAND
PIOT
____________
Appeal No. 95-3562
Application No. 08/110,9961
____________
HEARD: January 13, 1999
____________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 16 through 25.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a waterproof
composition for covering eyelashes (mascara) composed of a wax
component, a thickening agent, a volatile organic solvent, and
1Application for patent filed August 24, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007