Appeal No. 95-3562 Application No. 08/110,996 from the composition described by Arrandeau. Moreover, it is also significant that the relied upon prior art reference to Arraudeau is assigned to appellants’ assignee. Accordingly, some weight must be given to appellants’ argument that one skilled in the art would recognize that the propylene glycol actually functions as an emulsifier in the prior art composition. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ANDREW H. METZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN D. SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007