Appeal No. 95-3640 Application 08/147,742 optionally, malic acid or lactic acid, are especially suitable for the disinfection of heat-sensitive medical instruments, and that an aqueous 2% citric acid solution inactivated the hepatitis B virus, in vitro.2 The examiner acknowledges that none of the references discloses killing rhinoviruses, but argues that one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected antiviral compounds or compositions to be broadly therapeutic against all viral etiological agents and, therefore, to be effective against rhinoviruses (answer, pages 6-7 and 15). The examiner also argues that both polio viruses and rhinoviruses are in the Picornavirus genus and that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to use an antiviral disinfectant against members of the same genus (answer, page 16). These arguments are not well taken because they are not supported by 2In the answer (pages 8, 10, 13 and 15), the examiner discusses an article by Hendley (J. Owen Hendley et al., “Evaluation of Virucidal Compounds for Inactivation of Rhinovirus on Hands”, 14 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 690-94, Nov. 1978) which, the examiner states, his rejection does not require (answer, page 13). This article is not included in the statement of the rejection and, therefore, is not properly before us. See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342 n.3, 166 USPQ 406, 407 n.3 (CCPA 1970). We therefore do not discuss the examiner’s statements regarding this article. -9-9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007