THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MANFRED GALLUS, HERBERT GEBAUER
and OTTO IMMEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-3827
Application No. 08/031,7931
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, HANLON, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-16, all of the claims pending in the
application. The claims on appeal are directed to a process
for the production of an isocyanate or a mixture of
1Application for patent filed March 15, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007