THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUFUMI OGAWA, NORIHISA MINO and MAMORU SOGA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4065
Application No. 07/872,1851
____________
HEARD: March 9, 1999
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 8, 9 and 22, which are
all of the claims remaining in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
chemically adsorbed monomolecular film having a siloxane-based
1Application for patent filed April 22, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007