THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MITSURU SATO, HATSUYUKI TANAKA
and TOSHIMASA NAKAYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4109
Application No. 08/127,6401
____________
HEARD: April 7, 1999
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, JOHN D. SMITH and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1 through 9 which are all of the claims in the
application.
1Application for patent filed September 28, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007