THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ULRICH BRILL
____________
Appeal No. 95-4209
Application No. 07/862,4861
____________
HEARD: February 9, 1999
____________
Before PAK, OWENS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Ulrich Brill (appellant) appeals from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 4 and 5, which are all of the
claims remaining in the application. Claim 2 was amended
subsequent to the final rejection.
1Application for patent filed April 2, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007