THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JOHN CHARLTON,
PAUL F. CLARKE and ERNEST B. HAYES
______________
Appeal No. 95-4253
Application 07/890,3941
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 10 through 13, 24, 26, 30 and 31 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. Claims 14 2
through 16 and 18, also of record, have been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner under 37
CFR § 1.142(b).
1Application for patent filed May 26, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation
of application 07/584,293, filed September 18, 1990, now abandoned.
2Amendment of November 4, 1993 (Paper No. 21).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007