THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN C. KLOCK, JR.
__________
Appeal No. 95-4342
1
Application 07/938,832
__________
HEARD: July 14, 1999
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, TORCZON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
3 through 7, 14 through 16, 18 and 23 through 32, all the claims remaining in the
application.
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1992. According to appellant, this
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/753,196, filed August 30, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007