Appeal No. 1995-4366 Page 4
Application No. 08/150,744
178-183 stand rejected under § 103 as obvious over Lin in view
of Sakakibara. Rather than repeat the arguments of the
appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the
briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejections and evidence
advanced by the examiner. We also considered the arguments of
the appellants and examiner. After considering the entire
record before us, we are not persuaded that the examiner erred
in rejecting claim 177. We are persuaded, however, that the
examiner erred in rejecting claims 169-175 and 178-185.
Accordingly, we affirm-in-part. Our opinion addresses the
anticipation of claim 177, the obviousness of claims 178-183,
and the obviousness of claims 169-175, 184, and 185.
Anticipation of Claim 177
Regarding claim 177, the appellants “agree with the
Examiner that manipulation of the received image is necessary
in order for it to be displayed.” (Appeal Br. at 6.) They
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007