Appeal No. 1995-4366 Page 9
Application No. 08/150,744
Regarding claims 169-175, 184, and 185, the appellants
argue, “Lin does not teach a data processor which recognizes
commands contained in an image and executes the recognized
command. Adachi fails to cure this deficiency.” (Appeal Br.
at 7.) They add, “Lesnick, for different reasons, also fails
to cure the deficiency of Lin.” (Id. at 8.) The examiner
replies, “Adachi disclosed ... the part of the facsimile
transmission used for cyclic redundancy check ....”
(Examiner’s Answer at 4.) She adds, “Lesnick et al. also
disclosed ... the header page which specifies which operations
are to be performed ....” (Id.) We agree with the
appellants.
Independent claim 169 specifies in pertinent part “said
local data processor receiving said facsimile image and ...
recognizing specified data processor commands contained within
the received image, and executing the recognized specified
data processor commands.” Similarly, independent claim 184
specifies in pertinent part “the data processor recognizing
information contained within the received image data as
commands and ... retrieving stored information specified by
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007