THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROKAZU NAKAYOSHI, YOSHIKI SHIROCHI,
SEIZI SATO, HIROYUKI SHIOTA,
HIROSHI MAMIYA and NAOKI KAMAYA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4539
Application No. 08/205,3941
____________
HEARD: May 5, 1999
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the patent examiner's
final rejection of claims 2-4, 6-9, 11, 13-15, and 18-20.
Claims 1, 5, 10, 12, 16, and 17 have been canceled.
1 Application for patent filed March 3, 1994. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/951,854, filed
September 28, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007