THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEORGE L. FISH
____________
Appeal No. 95-4615
Application No. 08/158,8531
____________
HEARD: July 13, 1999
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 24, which
are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application No. 07/814,689, filed December 30, 1991,
now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007