Appeal No. 95-4761
Application No. 08/012,781
The specification stands objected to under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph, as failing to provide support for the
invention as claimed. Claims 17 and 18 stand finally rejected
under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for the reasons set forth in
the objection to the specification. Claims 14-20 stand
finally rejected under U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Soga or Luryi. Claims 14-20 stand further finally rejected
under U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Soga or Luryi
and further in view of Yokogawa. In the statement of the
grounds of rejection and in the arguments in the Answer, the
Examiner no longer relies on Yokogawa but rather only on Luryi
or Soga to support the rejection under U.S.C. § 103.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the 3
respective details thereof.
OPINION
3The Appeal Brief was filed August 25, 1995. In response
to the Examiner's Answer dated December 6, 1995, a Reply Brief
was filed February 6, 1996 which was acknowledged and entered
by the Examiner without further comment on March 8, 1996.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007