THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH F. BALL
____________
Appeal No. 95-4806
Application No. 08/155,7301
____________
HEARD: January 11, 1999
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed November 22, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/847,662 filed March 5, 1992, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,310,056 issued May 10, 1994; which is a continuation of
Application 07/809,048 filed December 16, 1991, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,174,449 issued December 29, 1992; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/593,335 filed October
1, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
06/864,026 filed May 16, 1986, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007