THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 35.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHEL DUBOIS, BEATRICE GUYOT
and RICHARD THOMMERET
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4810
Application No. 08/011,4991
____________
HEARD: November 2, 1999
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 4 through 10 and 12, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection (see the amendment dated June 30, 1994, Paper No.
13, entered as per the Advisory Action dated July 11, 1994,
1Application for patent filed January 29, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007