Appeal No. 1995-4810
Application No. 08/011,499
Upon the return of this application to the jurisdiction
of the examiner, the examiner and appellants should review the
patentability of the claimed subject matter in view of a full
English translation of the Japanese Kokai underlying the
“Abstract” used as the primary reference in the rejection
discussed above. From the limited disclosure of the Abstract,
we cannot determine if “polyarylene sulphide” specifically
includes PPS, if the “copolymeric polyamide” includes the
specific polyamide of appellants’ claims, if the melting point
desired for the polyamide is less than 170EC., what other 5
fillers are disclosed other than those exemplified in the
Abstract, or if any electrical properties are desired for the
compositions set forth in the Abstract. The examiner should
make these and any other appropriate determinations following
review of the full English translation of the reference.
This application is being remanded to the examiner for
appropriate action, including review and reconsideration of
the foregoing matters.
5Note that the melting point listed for these same nylon
polyamides in Williams is "above 180EC." (page 2, lines 21-
22).
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007