THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHIGEKI MORI and
TAKAKO NAKAJIMA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4812
Application No. 08/170,8391
____________
HEARD: May 4, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a toothpaste
composition having excellent bactericidal activity and
1Application for patent filed December 21, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007