THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EMERY S. ROSE
________________
Appeal No. 1995-5010
Application 08/116,2611
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of Claims 1 to 4, 6 and 12, all
1Application for patent filed August 9, 1993. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/832,534, filed February 7, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007