Appeal No. 1995-5010
Application 08/116,261
Wilson 5,113,116 May 12, 1992
(filed Oct. 5, 1989)
Ams et al. (Ams) 5,116,343 May 26, 1992
(filed Aug. 28, 1990)
Claims 1 to 4, 6 and 12 stand rejected 35 U.S.C. § 103
over various combinations of Takahashi, Sakurai, Wilson and
Ams.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answers for 2
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the
Examiner and the supporting arguments. We have, likewise,
reviewed the Appellant’s arguments set forth in the brief.
It is our view that the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103
over Takahashi, Wilson and Ams is reversed with respect to
2A supplemental answer [paper no. 34] was written in
response to the Remand [paper no. 33] from the Board of Patent
Appeals and Interferences. There was no reply brief.
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007