Ex parte SCHURMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-5048                                                           
          Application No. 08/162,372                                                   


               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                  
          rejection of claims 1 and 8-15,  all of the claims pending in2                                             
          the                                                                          
          application.  The claims on appeal are directed to a blow                    
          molded article.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter               
          on appeal and reads as follows:3                                             
          1.  A blow molded article comprising:                                        
               a blow molded, hollow, double walled article having an                  
          inner wall and an outer wall substantially parallel to each                  
          other and forming a space therebetween, and a connecting wall                
          connecting the inner and outer walls and running substantially               
          perpendicular to the inner and outer walls;                                  
               wherein said inner wall has an inner wall face including                
          an edge portion thereof adjacent the connecting wall and a                   
          central portion adjacent the edge portion;                                   
               at least one essentially U-shaped opening in the inner                  
          wall face, said opening being a cut portion of the central                   
          portion having components thereof essentially perpendicular to               
          each other, providing access to the space between the inner                  
          and outer walls and forming at least one flap member integral                

               2    Claims 4-7 were also finally rejected.  However,                   
          claims 4 and 5 were canceled in an amendment filed under 37                  
          CFR § 1.116 (Paper No. 6) entered by the examiner, and claims                
          6 and 7 were canceled in an AMENDMENT AFTER APPEAL (Paper No.                
          11) also entered by the examiner (see Supplemental Examiner's                
          Answer, p.2).                                                                
               3    Claim 1 was amended in the AMENDMENT AFTER APPEAL                  
          (Paper No. 11) referred to in footnote 2 above.                              
                                          2                                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007