THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GISULFO BACCINI
____________
Appeal No. 95-5066
Application No. 07/931,3301
____________
HEARD: March 09, 1999
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-3
and 5-7. Claims 8-11, the only other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn from2
further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not readable on the elected invention.
We REVERSE.
1 Application for patent filed August 18, 1992.
Claims 1 and 3 have been amended subsequent to the appealed rejection.2
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007