THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS CHEN-CHI YU, KENNETH W. POWERS
and HSIEN C. WANG
____________
Appeal No. 95-5097
Application No. 08/072,8071
____________
HEARD: May 7, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 10 through 17, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1993. According to
the appellants, the application is a division of Application
07/923,208, filed July 31, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007