Appeal No. 95-5103 Page 3
Application No. 08/074,303
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a glass article
forming machine. An understanding of the invention can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in
the appendix to the appellant's brief.
The prior art reference of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:
Farkas 4,338,115 July 6,
1982
Claims 1 through 4, 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to
particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
which the appellant regards as the invention.
Claims 1, 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Farkas.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007